The role of social media for the legal services market
PR and marketing - an indispensable component of any business, regardless of what product or service it sells. In the b2b market, especially in the legal business, there are some…

Continue reading →

What is the difference between a lawyer and a lawyer?
Practice shows that people often do not know whose help they need: a lawyer or a lawyer. We took this into account and decided to explain to you how the…

Continue reading →

Beginning of currency control during export operations
The issues of exercising currency control on import and export operations of residents is regulated by the Law of Ukraine "On the Procedure for Settlements in Foreign Currency" dated September…

Continue reading →

Is it right to change the “rules of the game” within the joint-stock company?

03/02/2015, the draft law on amendments to some legislative acts regarding the protection of investor rights was adopted as a basis. The government initiated the changes to the legislation.

According to the developers, the main goal of the bill is to increase the level of protection of investor rights in the framework of the joint-stock company and the introduction of higher requirements for joint-stock companies. The main means of implementation should be the introduction of new and clarification of the procedural mechanisms governing the shareholder’s relationship with the company and its governing bodies.

But already during the initial legal analysis of the government project, a certain critical attitude to the issued standards arises.

Experienced lawyers from the Siberia Project company, providing consulting services in Tyumen, conducted a legal analysis of the innovations. In the course of studying the issue, it became necessary to clarify the nature of the initiative to refer disputes related to compensation for damage caused to a joint-stock company by an official of the company to the jurisdiction of economic courts. Obviously, the subject of such a case is not related to economic disputes, but is resolved in a civil order, or in the same manner, but within the framework of the criminal proceedings, depending on the circumstances and extent of the damage.

Why did you need procedural duplication? And how appropriate is it to grant the right to sue the owners of 5% of the vote of the total number of shareholders? Obviously, disagreements between participants and managers may appear at any industrial facility. The draft law is preparing a platform for the emergence of a significant number of lawsuits as an instrument of internecine struggle.

The adoption of this law will significantly increase financial costs for the organization of company management, which will negatively affect business structures that are only formally joint-stock companies, but in reality they are not. The provision on the annual re-election of the Supervisory Board does not provoke approval either. It is not clear how well members of the council for such a period can fulfill their job responsibilities.

The question arises, is it right to change the “rules of the game” within the joint-stock company when the business is below the survival line?

The answer is simple. The main goal of this legislative initiative is not to really protect the rights of investors and shareholders. The main goal lies behind the inability of the government to participate in the management of enterprises where there is a state share, as well as where the state share is 50% or more.

This situation is caused by the fact that private capital, by appointing “its” chairman of the board, controlling the members of the supervisory board, changing the charter of the company in favor of the management, retains the management of industrial facilities. It is rather difficult for statesmen to correct this situation within the framework of the current legislation.

It can be concluded that this draft law does not really protect the rights of investors. In a peculiar way, this is an attempt to create a “pill” from state insolvency to influence powerful business groups that control, including state property. But, when the norms of such a law fulfill their short-term purpose, a new need will arise for bringing the legislation in line with future realities.

Currently, the state needs legislative initiatives that are designed to stabilize the economic situation in industry and exclude the possibility of a constant struggle for industrial objects between business structures with the help of the state.

How not to fall into the abyss with an arbitration clause: TOP 5 tips
There is much debate around what is best: state courts or the “Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), to which arbitration belongs. However, it is obvious that it is arbitration that is…

...

Lawmakers greatly simplified the relationship of entrepreneurs with the state
The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine at an extraordinary meeting on 02.03.2015 adopted the Law of Ukraine "On licensing of types of economic activity" (hereinafter - the Law). The adoption of…

...

Risks of assessing civil contracts as labor relations
After the introduction in our country of financial responsibility for violation of labor legislation, the vesting of state authorities and local self-government with significant powers in the process of monitoring…

...

How to sue the recovery of alimony from her ex-husband?
This article talks about alimony: what it is, how much a person should pay for his child, and what to do, even if these meager amounts are not paid. Having…

...