Trade Facilitation Agreement: New Opportunities for Ukraine
According to the results of an international study by the World Bank Doing business 2014, over the past 2 years, Ukraine has significantly improved its position in the overall ranking…

Continue reading →

Customer Service: How to Maintain Loyalty
Customer Service: How to Maintain Loyalty Lawyers' loyalty to client problems By conducting analytical work to collect information and conduct business training, employees of the Moscow City Collegium of Lawyers…

Continue reading →

Real estate tax as a negative factor in "quick reforms"
Today, we are sadly forced to state that the implementation of the tax reform in December 2014 and the introduction of the corresponding amendments as a whole package only negatively…

Continue reading →

Offshore companies as an asset protection tool have not disappeared

What is important for the owner of any asset? The optimal taxation of such an asset over the time it has been held and partly the desire to keep its name from the general public. Offshore companies inherently have such functions – with their help tax optimization and asset protection are achieved. An offshore is also commonly associated with maintaining the anonymity of the ultimate beneficiary.

Since December 2012, EU officials at various levels, heads of financial departments of individual European states have announced an intensification of the fight against offshore companies, in particular in the Eurozone. Under pressure from the EU, they expressed their readiness to revise the national rules for the provision of information about the owners of bank accounts in countries such as Austria, Luxembourg and even Switzerland. In particular, for almost half a year Switzerland has had a law on the provision of information on accounts of foreign taxpayers. Already in May, it became known that the G5 countries (Great Britain, France, Italy, Spain, Germany) will have access to information about account holders, balances and financial transactions in banks of offshore companies such as Fr. Jersey, about Maine, Bermuda and Cayman Islands.

In our opinion, the assertion about the impossibility of using offshore companies to protect assets and optimize taxation in the future is erroneous. Of course, where previously it was possible to secure capital when creating a legal entity, for example, through reorganization in the form of annexation or through direct use of one offshore company, today you need two, three, or even a whole chain of companies. But offshore companies, as an asset protection tool, have not disappeared, except for the slightly increased administrative costs of this tool.

Of the significant innovations that the EU is developing today in the context of the global recession, it is worth paying attention to those that will allow us to fight one of the main functions of asset protection – optimal taxation. In particular, in the near future, laws may appear in the laws of EU countries according to which fiscal authorities have the right to bypass chains of artificially created corporate structures or contractual chains, if there is reason to believe that their main and obvious goal is to save on taxes. In practice, this threatens that fiscal authorities at a level with the current powers of the courts alone will be able to assess the economic nature of any relationship for tax purposes.

In our opinion, this is a magistrally wrong vector of state-company relations. Each company has the right to study, analyze and use all legal ways to reduce costs (in particular tax), protect assets. This is the company’s responsibility to the owners. Therefore, the use of other jurisdictions to protect assets cannot be a basis for allegations of tax evasion. One thing is clear for sure: any radical changes regarding the possibility of using certain offshore jurisdictions are preceded by an active PR company of the authors of these changes. This time is enough to navigate the situation and, if necessary, carry out asset restructuring in favorable jurisdictions.

Public accusation of corruption: risks and consequences
On May 22, 2015, draft law No. 1165 was adopted in the second reading, which introduced a public prosecution procedure in the investigation of corruption crimes. If you do not…

...

Organization of teamwork in the legal business
Legal business is a combination of skill and managerial decisions of a managing partner, aimed at achieving the goal of a law firm. This business is characterized, in particular, by…

...

How not to fall into the abyss with an arbitration clause: TOP 5 tips
There is much debate around what is best: state courts or the “Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), to which arbitration belongs. However, it is obvious that it is arbitration that is…

...